home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1992
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 91-734 NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. V. WEST, WILLIAM
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Morales v. Trans World
-
- Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. ____ (1992).
-
- 91-6762 CORLEY, DANNY K. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is
-
- remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the
-
- Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of
-
- Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- D-1097 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF BRUCE ALAN FRIEDMAN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Bruce
-
- Alan Friedman, of Los Angeles, California, has resigned
-
- from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- California and this Court by order of March 23, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Bruce Alan Friedman from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Bruce Alan Friedman be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1098 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL THOMAS KENNEY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- Thomas Kenney, of Santa Ana, California, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of California and this Court by order of March 23, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Michael Thomas Kenney from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael Thomas Kenney
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1099 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HENRY CLAY HART, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Henry
-
- Clay Hart, Jr., of Morgantown, West Virginia, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Appeals of West Virginia and this Court by order of
-
- March 30, 1992, having suspended the said Henry Clay
-
- Hart, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Henry Clay Hart, Jr. be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1101 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARK TEMPLE WATSON
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Mark
-
- Temple Watson, of Elizabeth, Kentucky, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Kentucky and this Court by order of March 30, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said Mark Temple Watson from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Mark Temple Watson be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1106 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HOWARD HOROWITZ
-
- Howard Horowitz, of Coral Gables, Florida, having
-
- requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this
-
- Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the
-
- roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of
-
- this Court. The Rule to Show Cause, heretofore issued on
-
- April 6, 1992, is hereby discharged.
-
- D-1108 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN FRANKLIN ROSCH
-
- It having been reported to the Court that John
-
- Franklin Rosch, of Glen Ellyn, Illinois, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of Illinois and this Court by order of April 6, 1992,
-
- having suspended the said John Franklin Rosch from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said John Franklin Rosch be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1131 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES R. BRITTON
-
- It is ordered that James R. Britton, of Bismarck,
-
- North Dakota, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1132 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MARVIN L. KAISER
-
- It is ordered that Marvin L. Kaiser, of Williston,
-
- North Dakota, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1133 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF VINCENT THOMAS SNYDER
-
- It is ordered that Vincent Thomas Snyder, of
-
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1134 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT YUTAKA KIMURA
-
- It is ordered that Robert Yutaka Kimura, of
-
- Honolulu, Hawaii, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1135 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ARTHUR J. PIKEN
-
- It is ordered that Arthur J. Piken, of Kew Gardens,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1136 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF VALENTINE FRASER PARKER
-
- It is ordered that Valentine Fraser Parker, of
-
- Huntington, New York, be suspended from the practice of
-
- law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1137 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM CAHN
-
- It is ordered that William Cahn, of Tido Beach, New
-
- York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 90-985 BRAY, JAYNE, ET AL. V. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC
-
- This case is restored to the calendar for
-
- reargument.
-
- 91-453 LUCAS, DAVID V. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL COUNCIL
-
- The motion of National Growth Management Leadership
-
- Project, et al. to withdraw Chesapeake Bay Foundation
-
- from the list of members joining its amicus curiae brief
-
- is granted.
-
- 91-871 BATH IRON WORKS CORP., ET AL. V. DIR., OFFICE OF WCP, ETC.
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General for divided
-
- argument is granted.
-
- 91-1075 BAILES, GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioner for costs and fees is
-
- denied.
-
- 91-1521 UNITED STATES V. GREEN, LOWELL
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense
-
- with printing the joint appendix is granted.
-
- 91-1671 MERTENS, WILLIAM J., ET AL. V. HEWITT ASSOCIATES
-
- The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in
-
- this case expressing the views of the United States.
-
- 91-1863 KLAGISS, RAYMOND I. V. INDIANA
- (A-747)
- The application for stay addressed to Justice
-
- Blackmun and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- 91-7328 HERRERA, LEONEL T. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to
-
- participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for
-
- divided argument is granted.
-
- 91-7758 IN RE BURTON R. LANDES
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- June 29, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
- 91-7938 IN RE HENK VISSER
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until June 29, 1992 within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- court. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would deny
-
- the petition for a writ of mandamus.
-
- 91-8013 CLAMPITT, ROSEMARIE V. INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- June 29, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 91-522 SAUDI ARABIA, ET AL. V. NELSON, SCOTT, ET UX.
-
- 91-1645 WOOD, DALLAS C. V. CIR
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
-
- 91-7580 GRAHAM, GARY V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted.
-
- 91-7358 BRECHT, TODD A. V. ABRAHAMSON, SUPT.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted limited to Question I presented by the
-
- petition.
-
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-505 WEST, WILLIAM V. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.
-
- 91-1396 MARSHALL, ABIGAIL, ET AL. V. SAN FRANCISCO SOCIAL SERVICE
-
- 91-1398 WALDMAN, HERBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1443 MACKIE, THOMAS V. FDIC, ETC.
-
- 91-1489 LEE, MONTE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1504 DEGEROLAMO, VINCENT, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1517 BREGNARD, DALE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1581 UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS V. GERRISH CORP.
-
- 91-1628 ROSENGARD, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1647 SEPE, STEPHEN V. FLORIDA
-
- 91-1650 LEE, ROBERT W. V. BAPTIST MED. CTR OF OKLAHOMA
-
- 91-1654 STARKEY LABORATORIES, INC. V. GN DANAVOX, INC.
-
- 91-1655 GARDNER, JOSEPH, ET AL. V. RYAN, SEC. OF ST., ILLINOIS
-
- 91-1656 OKLAHOMA V. BURKE, GARY
-
- 91-1659 BYRD, VIRGINIA, ET AL. V. BUHAROV, NICHOLAS, ET AL.
-
- 91-1661 FERRIS, PAUL V. BD. OF CTY. COMMRS., ET AL.
-
- 91-1666 INTL. RESOURCES, ET AL. V. NY LIFE INS. CO.
-
- 91-1675 ZARDA, BERNARD, ET AL. V. KANSAS, ET AL.
-
- 91-1678 MERCADO LATINO, INC. V. SOLER, ALBERT, ET AL.
-
- 91-1687 BLANKINSHIP, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. CINCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
-
- 91-1689 PATTERSON, WILLIAM S. V. KEANE, SUPT.
-
- 91-1705 MALTA, JACOB H., ET AL. V. SCHULMERICH CARILLONS, ET AL
-
- 91-1714 PRICE, CAROLYN V. CARPENTER, DON, ET AL.
-
- 91-1726 PHANTOM TOURING V. AFFILIATED PUB., ET AL.
-
- 91-1731 STRANCZEK, CHESTER, ET AL. V. SCHULTZ, MARY, ET AL.
-
- 91-1761 PRAVDA, FRANK V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 91-1768 McCARTY, RICKY V. KENTUCKY
-
- 91-1776 ERWIN, ANN, ET AL. V. CITY OF CHICAGO, ET AL.
-
- 91-1795 DANIELS, BRIAN P. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1801 GILBERT, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1810 TOLER, REGGIE L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1828 COPLIN, DUANE, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6757 HERNANDEZ, ROGELIO R. V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7377 MOOYMAN, JOHANNES G. V. WORKMEN'S COMP. APPEAL BD., ET AL.
-
- 91-7494 RUCKINGER, JACQUELYN J. V. FULCOMER, DPTY. COMMR.
-
- 91-7574 MARQUEZ, CARLOS A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7583 WAKE, WARREN E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7589 DEBS, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7597 GUNTER, DAVID A. V. OHIO
-
- 91-7598 HILL, KEITH L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7610 MEDRANO, LUIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7629 COOPER, CLINTON L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7666 SCHANDL, EMIL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7759 SINDRAM, MICHAEL V. NELSON, SHIRLEY, ET AL.
-
- 91-7866 McCONNELL, DOLORES V. DERWINSKI, SEC., VET. AFFAIR
-
- 91-7894 STOIANOFF, CARROLL V. WACHTLER, SOL
-
- 91-7956 ANDERSSON, NILS, ET UX. V. FIBER COMPOSITES, INC.
-
- 91-7962 BOLINDER, VERN H. V. GALLARDO, ELIZABETH
-
- 91-7964 SHAW, DAVID V. SENKOWSKI, WARDEN
-
- 91-7968 DELLAERO, JOSEPH V. ABRAMS, ATTY. GEN. OF NEW YORK
-
- 91-7976 SHUMATE, JOSEPH V. NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF NORTH CAROLINA
-
- 91-7978 ALKATABI, HASAN, ET UX. V. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, ET AL.
-
- 91-7981 DAVIS, KENNETH C. V. COLORADO
-
- 91-7982 HOWELL, MARCUS L. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-7983 EAST, ASHSHA V. WEST ONE BANK, N.A.
-
- 91-7985 DAVASHER, MARC S. V. ARKANSAS
-
- 91-7988 ZICHKO, JOHN V. NAVARRO, J. DAVID
-
- 91-7990 WHIGHAM, JO V. NEW YORK TELEPHONE
-
- 91-7992 WOHLFORD, WILLIAM, ET UX. V. MAYS, DWAIN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7998 CRUSE, WILLIAM B. V. FLORIDA
-
- 91-8006 MASTERSON, SHANE L. V. GROOSE, SUPT.
-
- 91-8008 BROOKS, CLAUDE R. V. TANSY, WARDEN
-
- 91-8011 AZIZ, WASIM V. MISSOURI, ET AL.
-
- 91-8014 CASSIDY, WAYNE V. REDMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-8016 BURNETT, TREVOR I. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8027 COMBS, RONALD D. V. OHIO
-
- 91-8032 MIDGYETTE, HOMER A. V. GRAYSON, WARDEN
-
- 91-8034 FUENTES, DANIEL P. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8038 CHATMAN, WILLIAM D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8041 WHALEY, LESLIE A. V. MAASS, MANFRED
-
- 91-8048 PASCUAS, LUIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8072 MILLER, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8077 FIELDS, ROSCOE W. V. TENNESSEE
-
- 91-8090 ZOLICOFFER, WELTON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8101 AULTMAN, WAYNE O. V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 91-8112 ADAMS, GLORIA A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8133 GUZMAN, STEVEN L. V. WISCONSIN
-
- 91-8134 FRAZIER, KENNETH W. V. CUSTODIAN OF KENTUCKY ST. REFORMATORY
-
- 91-8138 PRUNEDA-GONZALEZ, SALATIL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8145 COUSINO, PAUL W. V. ACTION MAILERS, ET AL.
-
- 91-8149 PATRONE, KENNETH J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8151 PETTAWAY, SAMUEL E., ET AL. V. BEYER, ADMINISTRATOR
-
- 91-8156 BANKS, BILLY B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8157 KRAUSE, GEORGE A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8163 TIMBERS, RALPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8170 ZSIDO, MICHAEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8176 BLAIZE, TOAFIG V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8178 McNEIL, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8194 DIGGS, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8197 CORTES, GUSTAVO L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8205 McCOY, JOHN P. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8208 DAVIS, JACK C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8210 PORTWOOD, LAMAR V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-8213 McCALL, FRANK A. V. HESSON, WARDEN
-
- 91-8215 METZGER, FRANK V. RYAN, SUPT.
-
- 91-8252 ROBINSON, ALFREDO A. V. JABE, WARDEN
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 90-1606 ATTY. GEN. OF CALIFORNIA V. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari. Justice Souter
-
- took no part in the consideration or decision of this
-
- petition.
-
- 91-142 TIDEWATER MARINE, ET AL. V. AUBRY, LLOYD, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Maritime Law Association of the
-
- United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
-
- is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 91-349 PACIFIC MERCHANT SHIP. ASSN. V. AUBRY, LLOYD, ETC.
-
- The motion of American Waterways Operators, Inc.
-
- for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-502 PUC OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. V. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP.
-
- The motion of California Trucking Association for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- motion of International Brotherhood of Teamsters for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- motion of National Association of Regulatory Utility
-
- Commissioners for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
-
- is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is
-
- denied.
-
- 91-1426 CALIFORNIA V. HARDEN, STEPHEN
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-1519 COSTELLO, VINCENT V. McENERY, THOMAS, ET AL.
-
- 91-1672 BIODEX CORPORATION V. LOREDAN BIOMEDICAL, ET AL.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice White would grant certiorari.
-
- 91-7972 JONES, NADIA D. V. AT&T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
-
-
- COMMON LAW CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-1709 IN RE JACQUELINE MILLS
-
- The petition for a common law writ of certiorari
-
- and/or mandamus is denied.
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
- 91-8281 IN RE KWOH CHENG SUN
-
- The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.
-
-
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
- 91-7876 IN RE ROBERT KALTENBACH
-
- 91-7943 IN RE MARVIN CRENSHAW
-
- 91-8067 IN RE NICHOLAS BACHYNSKY
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
- 91-1405 OPTIMAL DATA CORP. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1457 PIOTROWSKI, BERNIE, ET AL. V. CITY OF CHICAGO
-
- 91-7026 COVILLION, JOSEPH E. V. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY, ET AL.
-
- 91-7264 IN RE RONALD W. JARVI
-
- 91-7298 WICKLIFFE, LONNIE V. AIKEN, COMMR., INDIANA DOC
-
- 91-7520 FITE, JAMES T. V. CANTRELL, PHILLIP, ET AL.
-
- 91-7532 MEYER, OSCAR A. V. MEYER, ANNA D.
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Monday, June 8,
-
- 1992 until Friday, June 12, 1992.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-